The mechanism is one: the system counts what each person gave, and what each takes home follows from it. What changes is what counts as giving. Pick the case closest to you.
A partner programme for sales
You have a product, and you want people to sell it and take a share of the profit.
There is no per-customer commission here. What gets recorded is what you put in: money spent on advertising is logged as a resource, hours spent with prospects as a mission - both with the partners' consent. Your share of the rikma follows from that, and incoming sales money is split by it. Whoever invested more this month takes more, and your investment is on the books before the first sale even closes.
A few professionals joining for a single job, who would rather not argue about the split at the end.
Each logs the hours they worked and the money and equipment they put in, as it happens and with everyone's consent. When payment arrives the split is already calculated from what actually happened, not from who remembers what. Someone who gave less during a busy month owes no apology, and the number corrects itself.
You have a venture in mind and you are missing the people who bring what you do not have.
You publish open missions and resources, and whoever fits offers themselves. They join as a partner on what they give, without a salary you cannot pay yet. If nothing comes of it they lost no wages, and if it does, their share is already on record.
You are not here to start a partnership - you are here as a customer, and what you need is not sold ready-made anywhere.
You describe what you want in your own words, and the system breaks it into components. A rikma of providers who complete each other forms around the request, and you get a whole plan to approve - nothing starts until you approve it. It is the same circle as the other cases here, only it begins with you.
The mechanism does not depend on the kind of business. If you are unsure how it fits what you do, book a personal 20-minute demo and we will go through it together.